How to detect the SACK Panic vulnerability with Wireshark

Our security researchers have recently performed an in-depth analysis of the SACK Panic vulnerability (which was first disclosed in June 2019) to find out its exploitability against Linux machines…

Smartphone

独家优惠奖金 100% 高达 1 BTC + 180 免费旋转




Validating Ideas

After we had settled with one idea, the Tamagotchi 2.0, we started to create the first minimum viable product that we could validate with our target users. A minimum viable product is essentially a product or service that includes only the most important features for it to work. First, we set a primary goal for our product, which was “make users take care of their health and fitness through taking care of a virtual avatar”. The primary goal came from the idea that the Avatar would have needs that the user needs to take care of by training. For example, if the Avatar is feeling low in energy, it would notify the user about it and the user should go for a run to give the Avatar energy. After we had a primary goal, we decided a basic user flow that wouldn’t have anything extra. The user flow is as follows: 1. Adopt a virtual Avatar, 2. Pay attention to Avatar’s current status, 3. Take care of Avatar by training, 4. Help Avatar recover. These tasks include several features, some of which are more essential than others. The picture below shows the MVP and its features. The line shows which features were included in the MVP. We’ve used a service called Whimsical to do everything online and remotely — it’s worked well and is worth trying!

Polar Partner is letting Jake know that it’s not breathing properly during his run.

Jake is finished with his run and Polar Partner gives him instructions for cool down and stretching

To highlight a few varying results, we gathered that the target users have neutral opinion on Polar Partner (Likert average 3.2) and almost all respondents mentioned that feedback is important (Likert average 4.4). Also, we noted that people have a neutral opinion on projected interface (Likert average 3.3), but we got good feedback on the fact that it doesn’t necessarily work well with long sleeves, which is quite obvious in Finland and what we hadn’t thought about. One of the top desired features was the easy-to-read data (Likert average 4.7). The validation gave us great insights on how to proceed further with the idea and solution. We don’t need to “kill the whole baby”, but we certainly need to do some changes based on the feedback we received. It’s true that it’s important to seek feedback actively because there’s almost always something we haven’t had time to consider.

Add a comment

Related posts:

Coronavirus is NOT the Only News

Every other story on the platform is about coronavirus, or so it seems. Everyone is capitalizing on the hot topic of the day to gain clicks, present company included. But there is more to life than…

Como Emagrecer e Secar a Barriga rapidamente em 3 passos

Aprenda a emagrecer e secar a barriga em 3 passos básicos que te ajudarão a conseguir chegar lá. Veja os passos da vitória para perder peso e emagrecer e secar a barriga. A primeira coisa que devemos…

Are Women More Prone To Anxiety Disorders Than Men?

Everyone has experienced anxiety at some point in their life. Whether you have been diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder, experienced uneasiness about your future, or even just suffered from a…